Competition Law
| Rank | Name | Agg. Deals Value | Clients Dimension | N. of Transactions |  |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Last Quarter |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carey | 6085 | 4417 | 3 | 88% | 100% | 88% | 88% | 88% |  |
| 2 | FerradaNehme | 2500 | 3500 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na |  |
| 3 | Barros & Errázuriz Abogados | 2040 | 3381 | 4 | 96% | 92% | 96% | 96% | 100% | |
| 4 | Philippi Prietocarrizosa Ferrero DU & Uría | 1945 | 4171 | 6 | 97% | 97% | 91% | 88% | 97% | |
| 5 | Dentons | 450 | 75 | 1 | 89% | 95% | 91% | 91% | 91% | |
| 6 | Morales & Besa | 210 | 1217 | 3 | na | na | na | na | na |  |
| 7 | Claro y Cia | 205 | 875 | 2 | 92% | 92% | 92% | 92% | 92% | |
| 8 | Cariola, Díez, Pérez-Cotapos & Cía Ltda | 150 | 5000 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
| 9 | DLA Piper Chile | 150 | 5000 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
| 10 | Bofill Escobar Silva | 150 | 75 | 1 | na | na | na | na | na | |
| Rank | Name | Agg. Deals Value | Clients Dimension | N. of Transactions | |
|
|
|
|
Last Quarter |